Clinical Infectious Diseases, also known as CAIDS, is a peer reviewed medical journal published by Oxford University Press focusing on research on the causes, pathogenesis, analysis, treatment, management and prevention of infectious diseases. In addition to its recognized role in professional medicine, the journal has done immense good to the field of public health by spreading information on vital medical issues. It has always been a reliable source of information for persons affected by infections like AIDS, Hepatitis C, HIV, and herpes. However, recent years have seen a considerable decline in the publication of this well-researched medical journal. This is perhaps due to increased pressures on medical professionals to perform quick and effective cures, and medical journals have been pressured by governments and regulatory bodies to publish reports of successful cures that quickly remove the stigma from infections like AIDS and hepatitis.
The decline in the popularity of the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases can be attributed to the fact that it was unable to meet these demands by providing fast results. The rapidly changing face of medical science and the advancement in technology have made possible enormous changes in the area of medicine. Rapid advances in technology allow researchers to carry out more research in a shorter time span and with greater resources. Simultaneously, there have been major changes in the way trials are conducted, the number of cases that can be included and the number of patients who need to be included for the study. These changes have had a dramatic effect on the manner in which the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases was able to remain a popular source of information.
One of the most important aspects of the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases was the extent of coverage and the level of criticism that was aimed at the publishing house. The editors had to publish articles under very tight time constraints, emphasising the importance of rigorous and transparent methodology to ascertain causality of infections. They had to ensure that the right clinical data was documented so as to avoid accusations of plagiarism. A major problem faced by the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases was the use of language that could be interpreted as suggestive or even opinion based.
Clinical Review Articles And Infectious Diseases
This, together with the increasing complexity of the microbiology field and the increasing number of cases that were being diagnosed and reported, prompted the founding of the journal to provide a venue for critical scrutiny of the medical practice. This has not, however, resulted in the closure of this popular medical periodical. On the contrary, the editors continue to strive for accuracy and objectivity in their writing, while providing the wider base of information that is needed to improve clinical practice. The chief motive of the Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, even in its current issues, is to maintain an authoritative position regarding the microbiology of infections and their treatment. In other words, the objective of the journal is to contribute towards the improvement of standards of care and clinical practice.
In the field of infectious diseases, it is important to have independent review organizations that are able to ascertain the quality of published work. In fact, several online open access journals have started to appear in recent years as a result of the increased demand for reliable information on medical topics. Many of these open access journals provide independent reviews that help to determine whether work being published is of high quality. Some of the best online journals for this purpose are the Annual Review of Microbiology and Infection, Reviews of Environmental Quality of Healthcare, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Principles of Infection Therapy, Rheumatology and Infection Therapy, Journal of Virology, and Emerging Infections.
In spite of the increase in the number of clinical infections being diagnosed and reported, accurate diagnosis and effective treatment is difficult to achieve for many patients and health-care providers. This is mainly because of the lack of guidelines and diagnostic tools that are necessary in order to accurately assess the current developments in the field of medical science. This is further compounded by the lack of accurate and reliable testing methods that make the diagnosis of clinical infectious diseases even more difficult. For example, current developments in genomics and sequencing technologies have made it possible to test for infectious agents using very few DNA samples from patients. Unfortunately, even with these advanced tools and methods, it is still not possible to make an accurate diagnosis in a majority of cases.
The next time you find yourself reading through an article on any topic related to clinical microbiology, it is advisable to take a closer look at the source. Clinical review articles are an important source of information for many individuals who are interested in learning more about the diagnosis and treatments of infections like HIV and herpes. When performed properly and according to the standards set by established review organizations, such publications can play a key role in keeping both medical and scientific communities abreast of emerging trends in the field. For any medical professional, it is always necessary to be able to accurately identify an infection and its subsequent effects in order to provide the best possible medical care to patients.